Comma.ai Cancels Comma One Semi-Autonomous Driving Kit

The NHTSA sent Comma.ai CEO George Hotz a letter encouraging him to delay the Comma One semi-autonomous driving kit over concerns it "would put the safety of your customers and other road users at risk."


After being pressured by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to delay selling its Comma One semi-autonomous driving kit, Comma.ai has cancelled the Tesla Autopilot-like system.

Comma.ai CEO George Hotz launched Comma One last month at TechCrunch Disrupt SF. He said the $999 aftermarket device won’t turn your car into a self-driving vehicle, but that it’s the equivalent of Tesla Autopilot without having to buy a new car.

However, the NHTSA sent Hotz a letter on October 27, 2016 (read it below) that said “we are concerned that your product would put the safety of your customers and other road users at risk. We strongly encourage you to delay selling or deploying your product on the public roadways unless and until you can ensure it is safe. It is insufficient to assert, as you do, that your product ‘does not remove any of the driver’s responsibilities from the task of driving.’ As you are undoubtedly aware, there is a high likelihood that some drivers will use your product in a manner that exceeds its intended purpose.”

If Comm.ai didn’t comply with the NHTSA by November 10, 2016, it would be fined $21,000 per day. So Hotz decided to cancel Comma One and explore other markets outside the United States, and other products.

On October 20, 2016, Comma.ai posted a blog on its website called “On the safety and legality of the comma one.” The blog was a warning that Comma One will not turn your car into a self-driving vehicle and that it’s “very important that you pay attention.” Here’s the blog in its entirety:

“The comma one will not turn your car into an autonomous vehicle. It is an advanced driver assistance system. To put it in traditional auto manufacturer terms, it is “lane keep assist” and “adaptive cruise control”

“Our supported car, the Honda 2016/17 Civic with Sensing already has these features. But as anyone with the car will tell you, they aren’t very good. The comma.ai system is just much better. It provides no new functionality, so it should be legal everywhere the Honda systems are; it is an aftermarket upgrade.

“With all these Tesla autopilot like systems, it is very important that you pay attention. This system does not remove any of the driver’s responsibilities from the task of driving. We provide two safety guarantees:

“1. Enforced disengagements. Step on either pedal or press the cancel button to retake full manual control of the car immediately.

“2. Actuation limits. While the system is engaged, the actuators are constrained to operate within reasonable limits; the same limits used by the stock system on the Honda.

“At comma.ai, we are working as hard as we can to deliver the best possible user experience. Onward to the launch.”

After announcing the cancellation of Comma One, Comma.ai sent out a series of angry tweets from China, interestingly, directed at the NHTSA’s decision. One tweet said “the NHTSA never asked for a test drive.”

Comma.ai Cancels Comma One

Tesla CEO Elon Musk once offered Hotz a contract with a “multimillion-dollar bonus” to build a new Autopilot system. Hotz, however, turned down the offer. Ironically, Tesla is probably the reason NHTSA pressured Comma.ai. Afterall, Tesla’s Autopilot semi-autonomous driving system was under major scrutiny after a series of accidents, including the fatal accident that killed 40-year-old Joshua Brown.

Brown’s Tesla, on Autopilot, failed to apply the brakes as a tractor-trailer was making a left turn in front of the car. It turned out that Autopilot was never designed to handle the scenario that led to this fatal crash. Tesla and Mobileye, which initially collaborated on Autopilot, ended their relationship as a result of this fatal crash.


Self-Driving Car Research Report

Most carmakers are promising driverless models for circa 2020. Get to know the players, their self-driving strategies and the ingredient technologies that are driving this critical segment of robotics forward.

This report unpacks how the convergence of rapidly improving technology and changing consumer preferences is creating an inflection point for the transportation industry not seen in decades.

Download Report.


Consumer Reports urged Tesla to disable Autopilot following the crashes, saying “consumers should never be guinea pigs for vehicle safety ‘beta’ programs.” This is very similar to what NHTSA has said to Comma.ai.

Tesla has since announced that all its cars will be built with all the “hardware needed for full self-driving capability.” However, the self-driving system won’t be turned on until further testing is performed. This is a major move for Tesla as it moves away from the semi-autonomous nature of its Autopilot system to a fully autonomous system.

 




About the Author

Steve Crowe · Steve Crowe is managing editor of Robotics Trends. Steve has been writing about technology since 2008. He lives in Belchertown, MA with his wife and daughter.
Contact Steve Crowe: scrowe@ehpub.com  ·  View More by Steve Crowe.




Comments

Totally_Lost · October 29, 2016 · 12:26 am

I fully support the NHTSA decision that basically requires a manufacturer to prove their system is safe, and more importantly, doesn’t allow after-market kits to reduce or impair the originally tested safety of an automotive system, without significant proof that it’s better.

That clearly put comma.ai on notice that they had to do their testing and submit objective proof, rather than just make millions on the $1,000 option, and say opps ... we are sorry when it doesn’t work better/safer, and kills people.

Now if the NHTSA would just hold Tesla to the same standard.


Totally_Lost · October 29, 2016 at 12:26 am

I fully support the NHTSA decision that basically requires a manufacturer to prove their system is safe, and more importantly, doesn’t allow after-market kits to reduce or impair the originally tested safety of an automotive system, without significant proof that it’s better.

That clearly put comma.ai on notice that they had to do their testing and submit objective proof, rather than just make millions on the $1,000 option, and say opps ... we are sorry when it doesn’t work better/safer, and kills people.

Now if the NHTSA would just hold Tesla to the same standard.


Log in to leave a Comment



Editors’ Picks

CES 2018 AI Conference Schedule
Robotics Trends' AI conference at CES 2018 examines recent developments, current applications, and...

Unibo Robot Stars in Fujitsu AI Cloud Platform
Unibo can recognize users and customize conversations accordingly. Unibo can move its...

Jibo Music Brings iHeartRadio to Social Robot
ibo and iHeartRadio have teamed up to launch Jibo Music that will...

Japanese Startup GROOVE X Goes Viral as Teaser for LOVOT Robot
GROOVE X is teasing its LOVOT companion robots that are scheduled to...